If you've ever had a scan, a medication, or a procedure "denied" by your insurer, you've run into prior authorization — the rule that says your doctor has to ask permission before certain care is covered. It exists to keep low-value care in check. But in practice, a large share of the denials it produces aren't about value at all. They're about paperwork. And that distinction is the whole reason this site exists.
Here's what actually happens when prior authorization kicks in:
Look at that sequence again. When a denial gets overturned, the system didn't catch bad care — it created two round trips where one should have done: the original request that was denied, and the appeal that reversed it. In between sat a patient, waiting, often in pain, for care they were entitled to the whole time.
A denial that gets overturned isn't a safeguard working. It's a month of everyone's time spent proving something that was true on day one.
This is the big one, and it's the most frustrating because it had nothing to do with whether you needed the care. The request simply didn't match the insurer's checklist. A few real examples:
None of these are clinical disagreements. They're translation failures. The care met the criteria; the request didn't say so in the insurer's language.
The second kind is a denial the insurer issues even when the request was reasonable — and these are the ones that get overturned on appeal. Across more than 100,000 public records of independent appeal decisions, more than half of denials are reversed once an outside reviewer looks at them. For some categories — physical therapy, advanced imaging — the reversal rate is even higher. A coin-flip-or-worse error rate is not what a well-functioning gate looks like.
It's tempting to see prior authorization as a fight between patient and insurer. It isn't — the waste lands on all three parties:
When a denial is avoidable, reversing it doesn't save anyone money. It just moves the same approval to next month and adds two rounds of administration to get there. That's not cost control. It's friction with a price tag, paid by everyone.
Advanced imaging is one of the most prior-authorized services in healthcare, so it's a perfect illustration. Take an MRI of the lower back. The insurer's rule, in plain terms, is consistent across the major carriers:
Now picture two requests for the exact same scan. One says "low back pain, MRI requested." It's denied — premature, no documented conservative care. The other says "lumbar radiculopathy, eight weeks of failed physical therapy, radiating leg pain" — and it's approved. Same patient, same scan. The only difference is whether the request spoke the insurer's language. That gap is what turns a denial into an approval — and it's almost entirely knowable in advance.
If most denials are avoidable mismatches with a published checklist, then the obvious move is to read the checklist before the request goes in. The catch is that those checklists are buried in 40-page medical policies written for claims adjusters, not patients. That's the problem WillItCover solves.
You answer a few plain-language questions about your situation. We check them against your insurer's actual medical-necessity criteria and tell you where you stand — and exactly what's missing if you're not there yet. You walk into your doctor's office knowing what the request needs to say, so it's right the first time. No wasted round trip. No month-long appeal to prove a point that was true on day one.
Check your situation against your insurer's real criteria in about two minutes, and get a one-page sheet to bring to your doctor. No account, no sales call.
Check my coverageA doctor ordering care isn't the same as the request meeting the insurer's medical-necessity criteria. Most denials happen because a required detail — a qualifying diagnosis code, documented conservative treatment, or a specific exam finding — wasn't included in the request, not because the care wasn't justified. That's also why so many denials are overturned on appeal.
Across more than 100,000 public records of independent (external) appeal decisions, more than half of denials are reversed when an outside reviewer examines them. For some categories, like physical therapy and advanced imaging, the reversal rate is higher still.
No. A denial usually means the request, as submitted, didn't demonstrate that the care met the insurer's criteria. The care may well qualify — which is exactly why fixing the documentation, or appealing, so often succeeds.
Often, yes. The criteria are published in advance. If you know what your insurer requires — for example, six weeks of documented conservative care before an MRI — you can make sure the request includes it. WillItCover checks your situation against those criteria and shows you what's needed before anything is filed.
It's meant to steer patients away from low-value care. Used precisely, that has a place. The problem is the high rate of avoidable and reversed denials, which suggests the process catches a lot of appropriate care along with the rest — adding cost and delay for patients, doctors, and insurers alike.
Related: Coverage Check · all coverage tools